On Thursday, some legal professionals in Rivers State asserted that the PEPC’s ruling was legitimate and not motivated by personal feelings.
The attorneys responded to the PEPC ruling, which upheld President Bola Tinubu and Vice President Kashim Shettima’s victory in the 2023 presidential election, in a statement to the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN).
According to NAN, the petitions submitted by the Allied Peoples Movement (APM), Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), and Labour Party (LP) and their respective candidates against Tinubu and Shettima were dismissed by a five-person panel led by Justice Haruna Tsammani.
PEPC Judgment: We Owe Our Victory To Nigerians – Shettima
Senior Advocate of Nigeria Theo Osanakpo once stated that “what may be factually correct may be legally incorrect.”
He explained that cases are won by pleadings, which could be statements of claims or statements of defence.
“What you put in is what you will adduce as evidence. Whoever says I have 20 must have the evidence to show that they have 20; If they say that they have won, they would have been able to tender documents to prove it.
“The major challenge today is the perceptions of the Nigerian public; they feel that judges are compromised, so it becomes difficult.
“In other words, the judiciary should put in its utmost effort to regain the confidence of the people, making sure that they give justice judiciously and judicially,” he said.
Tribunal Verdict: ‘It’s Time For Them To Have Sense’, Keyamo Diss Obi, Atiku Supporters
Don Loho, a legal practitioner, said that law is different from sentiment.
According to him: “Judges talk about the law, not fact; that’s why you apply the law to situations; it is different from fact.”
Loho, who claimed that the legal team for the Labour Party did not perform well, drew attention to the fact that they spoke of winning elections and receiving the majority of the votes without mentioning the precise number of votes.
“How many votes did they have?” he asked rhetorically.
He further said that most of their positions were not filed.
“They were filing after the case, so those are areas where, definitely, the court cannot help them do it; the court will not have that power to do it. It’s most unfortunate,” he said.
UPDATE: Akpabio Advices Peter Obi, Atiku Over Tribunal Verdict
In response to the tribunal’s decision about the 25% vote in Abuja, he pointed out that the Supreme Court had already rendered a decision on the subject in the past and did not give Abuja any particular priority.
On his general assessment of the judgement, he said: “They must apply the law the way it is; we all wanted it the other way, but the law is different. That’s why Madam Justice is blind. It’s most unfortunate.”
A Port Harcourt attorney named Mrs. Onyinye Ileh expressed her satisfaction with the verdict, noting that the petitioners had been required to present evidence in support of their claims.
She maintained that the “judgement is based on the evidence in court.”
According to her: “No matter what you say orally, you must back it up with strong evidence. And then you check the section of the law that protects you on that issue.”
Ileh said that election matters deal with figures collected from polling units from wards, local government collation centres, and finally, at the state level, to get the final results.
Lady Collapses At Solidarity Venue As Tribunal Delivers Judgement (Photos)
“On this, it was said that the Labour Party did not do well; they did not call their agents as witnesses to give on-hand evidence but brought those who were not physically present at the units. You can’t allege that you were cheated when you don’t have figures to prove that you were cheated and could not prove it,” she said.
Follow us on Facebook
Post Disclaimer
The opinions, beliefs and viewpoints expressed by the author and forum participants on this website do not necessarily reflect the opinions, beliefs and viewpoints of Anaedo Online or official policies of the Anaedo Online.
